Investigating Active Education at the University: The Perspectives and Challenges from Faculty Members’ Viewpoints

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Educational Psychology, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Educational Sciences, University of Tehran

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify the perspectives and challenges in active education from the viewpoints of faculty member. The research was done through a qualitative and phenomenological approach. Participants in this study included 25 faculty members of Humanities Faculty of Tehran University; they were selected by purposeful sampling method and by selection of students by the training observation form. In this research, the data gathering instrument was a qualitative interview including open and standard questions; and the data were analyzed and classified according to the analytical and interpretive approaches of Strauss and Glaser's underlying theory. By examining the response phrases and after analyzing, interpreting and classifying, six categories were obtained: the description of education, the role of the teacher in teaching, the response to new methods, the trend towards new methods, and the challenges facing new methods and the necessary reforms to promote education. From the perspective of active education, active teaching professors focused on the interaction between the teacher and the student, while traditional method professors described active education based on the central role of the teacher in the classroom. Traditional professors highlighted the necessity of motivated and interested students for employing proactive methods and they mentioned lack of students’ readiness as the main reason for their unwillingness for using these methods. But professors of active education evaluated the changes made by education and interactive and they described two-way education as a desirable change of education to more activating and engage students in the educational process. Traditional professors mainly emphasized the disadvantages barriers of this active education, which they explained based on the central role of the teacher and his main role in the transferring content as much as possible. While the professors of active education identified four classes of teacher-related challenges, a training curriculum, an evaluation system and a challenge to the education structure and organization. Both groups of professors were common in expressing the necessary reforms to promote education, which is in four dimensions: the transformation of attitude towards education, structural reforms of higher education to facilitate active education, faculty empowerment and content review and evaluation methods adapted to the new educational approach. 

Keywords

References

Arreola. A. Raoul (2000), “Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system”, 2th edition, University of Tennessee. Press: Anker publishing Company.
Biggs J, Tang C(2007), Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill Education  : Open University Press.
Botelho, M. G. & Odonnell ,D. (2001). "Assessment of the use of Problem – Orientated, Small-group Discussion for Learning of a Fixed Prosthodontic", Simulation Laboratory Course, British Dental Journal (BDJ), 191(11), 630-663.
Boulter, Marla Lynn. ( 2010). The Influence of Socratic Questioning in Online Discussions on the Critical Thinking Skills of Undergraduate Students: An Exploratory Study Based on a Business Course at a Proprietary University, A Dissertation Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Education, The Faculty of The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University.
Capone. Maureen. (2010). The Perceptions of Dental Hygiene Students Regarding the Use of Narrative Pedagogy in Dental Hygiene Curriculum, A Dissertation Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Education at Dowling College, School of Education, Department of Educational Administration, Leadership and Technology , Dowling College Oakdale, New York.
Chism, N. (2004). “Facuty Development in the Use of Information Technologies: A Framework for Judging when and How to Use Specific Strategies”. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 12-31.
Curran VR, Sharpe D, Forristall J, Flynn K. (2008). Student satisfaction and perceptions of small group in case-based inter professional learning. Med Teaching, 30(4): 431-3.
Diaz. N. Andrea. (2009). Composing a Civic Life: Influences of Sustained Dialogue on Post-graduate Civic Engagement and Civic Life, A Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in human development, Fielding Graduate University.
Drummond- young, M., et al. (2010). "A comprehensive faculty development model for nursing education". Journal of Professional Nursing, 26 (3), 152–161. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.04.004
Ferrari, Jan. Ricketts. (2010). Critical Multicultural Education for Social Action, A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences, university of northern Colorado Greeley, Colorado.
Fink L. Dee (2002), “Improving the Evaluation of College Teaching”, University of Oklahoma, available at: http: //www.ou.edu/idp/index.htm.L
Grant, M. R. (2000). “Faculty Development in Two- Year Publicly Supported Community Colleges”; CSCC 42nd Annual Conference, Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Grant, M. (2005). Faculty Development in Community Colleges: A Model for Part-Time Faculty, to Improve The Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional and Organizational Development, 23(6), 122-131.
Hajhosseini. M, Zandi. S, Hosseini Shabanan. S , Madani. Y (2016). Cogent Education, CURRICULUM & TEACHING STUDIES | RESEARCH ARTICLE,  3: 1175051.
 Hill Rj. A. (2006). Comparative Study of Lecture and Discussion Methods .Studies in Adult Group Learning in the Liberal Arts , 5(1): 59
Hussain, I. (2012). Use of constructivist approach in higher education: an instructors’ observation. Creative Education, 3(2), 179-184
Jonson, D. CW., Jonson, R.T., & Stanne, M.E. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta- Analyses. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: Cooperative Center. www.co-operation.org/pages/cl-methods.html.
Khalid, A. & Muhammad, A.(2012). Constructivist Vs traditional: Effective instructional approach in teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (5), 170-177.
Lee, V.S., & ed. (2004). Teaching and Learning through Inquiry, Sterling, Virginia: stylus publishing.
Marsh H. W. (2001), “Multidimensional ratings of teaching effectiveness by students”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, pp. 150-166
Morable L(2000). Using active learning techniques, Texas: Technical Education Division
Peterson, Shari L. and Wiesenberg, Faye P. (2006), “The nature of faculty work: A POD Network (Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education), (2013). http://www.podnetwork.org/faculty_development/definitions.htm
O’Donnel, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2007). Educational Psychology: Reflection for action. USA: Wiley.
Sullivan. D.  Debra. (2004). an Analysis of Dialogue and Group Interaction during Collaborative Examination, A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, Capella University.
Sun Cho, Hye. (2008). Exploring Critical Literacies and Social Identities with Linguistic Minority Under graduations: a participatory Action research study, A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of  Philosophy second language, Hawaii University .
Trigwell, k,Prosser,M. and Waterhouse,F. (1999). Relations between teachers, approaches to teaching and students approaches to learning, Higher Education, 37,pp 57-70.
Vandewelle, J. A. (2001). “Elementary and middle school mathematics teaching developmentally”و New York:  Addison Wesley Longman Inc press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). “Tool and symbol in child development”, In M. cole V. Johon s. scribrer & E. soubeman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambrige: Harvard University Press.
Yannuzzi .j. Tomas. (2007). A Communication Perspective on Critical Pedagogy in Professional and Management Education : A Cross Cultural Look into Self- Serving Construction of  Everyday Problematic Events, A Dissertation Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy,  Pennsylvania State University . 
Wallace. W.  Susan. (2002). Friere and First Grade: In Pursuit Of Generative Themes, A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Education in curriculum studies, Georgia Southern University.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics