The Students’ Experience of the New Program of Internship on the Teacher Education in the Farhangian University of Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of the Department of Dentistry, Ministry of Health and Medical Education

2 farhangiyan university

3 Graduate student of Farhangian University

4 Instructor of elementary education group of Farhangian University

Abstract

The internship curriculum of the Farhangian University has been implemented since 2014. The program employs more than 12% of the training time and seeks to provide the opportunity to experience the application of theoretical knowledge in practical situations. The question is: “what experience has the student covered under this two-year program?” In this article, we seek to review the experience of the students, the first turn of the program, through an interview with 11 students, and a picture of the effects of the internship program. The experience of this group shows that the new program of internship has been "effective" and has been able to satisfy the students’ expecttaions, increase their competence and help shape and improve their teacher's identity. However, the implementation of the internship program is faced with a number of problems, including the lack of training of the brokers which could be purposefully improved.

Keywords


Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
-       Britzman, Deborah (1997). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learnin to teach. (2nd Ed.) Albany, NY:  State University of New York Press.
-       Brown, N. (2008). Assessment in the Professional area Context. Center for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching. University of Tasmania.
-       Cochran- Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Chapter 8: Relationships of knowledge and practice: teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
-       Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, ERIC: ERIC Number: ED493809.
-       Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. The Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453-477.
-       Douglas Adler James (2012). From campuz to class room: astudy of elementry Tteacher canadeans’ pedagogical content knowlege, THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, doctor of philosophy.
-       Hiebert, J. & Gallimore, R. & Stigler, W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: what would it look like and how can we get one. Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
-       Johnson, K. E. (1992). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(1), 83-108.
-       Levin, B.B., & He Ye (2008). Investigating the content and sources of preservice teachers’ personal practical theories (PPTs). Journal of Teacher Education, 59(1), 55-68.
-       Salerni, a (2014). Narrative: a critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge.
-       Schleicher, A. (2012), Ed., Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the World, OECD Publishing.
-       Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
-       Schwab, J. J. (1978). The practical: A language for curriculum. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.). Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays (pp. 287-321). Chicago: University of Chicago.
-       Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(4), 4-14.
-       Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23.
-       Troudi, S. (2005). Critical content and cultural knowledge for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Teacher Development, 9, 115-129.