The Role of Faculty Members in the Evaluation Process of Academic Curricula of Humanities in Top Universities of Iran and the World

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD in Curriculum Planning, Researcher and Teacher, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Curriculum Planning, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Curriculum Planning, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the status of faculty members in the evaluation of curricula of top universities in the country and the world in order to design a scale for evaluating the valid curriculum for faculty members. This research has a mixed method of exploratory-sequential type in the form of tool design. The statistical population consisted of four groups of curriculum development experts and faculty members from top universities, officials of study centers of top public universities, officials of the Ministry of Science and Documents of selected universities of the world. The sampling process was conducted through purposeful method and the data collection tools were a semi-organized interview, document analysis and a curriculum evaluation scale. The findings revealed that top universities around the world use the ideas from all internal and external stakeholders such as faculty members, students, alumni and employers in the curriculum evaluation process. in Iranian universities, internal and external stakeholders are limited in their ability to evaluate curricula, and faculty members are more likely to participate in the evaluation of academic curricula than other groups, depending on the context in which they are offered. Finally a scale of eight validated domains with 60 items and 6 open-ended questions is developed and presented for curriculum evaluation based on the perspectives of university faculty members.

Keywords

References

Academic Program Review Procedures. (2016). California State University. Available at: www.csustan.edu.
Academic Program Review Guidelines. (2019). University of Nebraska. Available at:www.unomaha.edu.
Ahmadi, S. (2017). Evaluation of the curriculum of higher education according to competencies from the point of view of information technology students of Shiraz University of Technology. Curriculum Research Quarterly, 8(2), 244-224 [in Persian].
Akhlaghi, F., Yarmohamedian, M., Khushkam, M., and Mohebi, N. (2010). Evaluation of the quality of educational programs in higher education using the SIP model. Health Information Management Quarterly, 8(25), 22-38 [in Persian]. 
Akker, J., and Verloop, N. (1994). Evaluation approaches and results in curriculum research and development in the Netherlands. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(4), 421-436.
Akyol, B., and Arslan, H. (2014). The evaluation of higher education problems in Turkey. European Scientific Journal. ESJ, 10(7).
Anderson, L. W., and Postlethwaite, T. N. (2012). Program evaluation: Large-scale and small-scale studies. International Institute for Educational Planning Series Booklet. 8.
Aslan, M., and Saglam, M. (2017). Methodological investigation of the curriculum evaluation Theses completed between the years 2006-2015 in Turkey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9), 1468-1478.
Blackmore, P., and Kandiko, C. B. (2012). People and Change: Academic Work and Leadership. In P. Blackmore., and C. B. Kandiko (Eds) Strategic Curriculum Change: Global trends in universities, Oxon: Routledge, pp.128-144.
Dixon Lee, C. (2010). An international curriculum for the health information management, Health Record Administration       Professional Workforce.
Driscoll, A., and de Noriega, D. C. (2006). Taking ownership of accreditation: Assessment processes that promote institutional improvement and faculty engagement. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Emil, S. (2011). Assessment for improvement in higher education: Faculty perception of and participation in program assessment. Dissertations and Theses.
Farasatkhah, M. and Moniyi, R. (2014). Factors affecting the participation of faculty members in higher education policy-making and university planning. Research and planning quarterly in higher education. 20(4), 53-29 [in Persian]. 
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2010). The principles and concepts of lesson planning. Tehran. Bal Publications [in Persian]. 
Fullan, M. (1991). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teacher College Press.
Fu, Y. (2016). A study on curriculum evaluation methods in higher education.  3rd International conference on management, education technology and sports science (METSS 2016).
Ghasemi Qalanoyi, S. (2009). Evaluation of the quality of the curriculum of the master's course in the field of curriculum planning. Master's thesis on curriculum planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Birjand University.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., and Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2013). The Basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership. (3rd ed., pp. 250-262). Boston: Pearson.
Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership. Volume3. 250-262.
Hussain, A., Dogar, A. H., Azeem, M., and Shakoor, A. (2011). Evaluation of curriculum development process. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(14), 263-271.
Johnson, J. A. (2001). Curriculum revision that works. In principles of effective change. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
Kiely, R., and Rea-Dickins, P. (2005). Program evaluation in language education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kindler, A. (2013). Principle, Procedures and Guidelines for External Academic Unit ReniversUviews. The University Of British Columbia office of The Provost.
Labanauskis, R., and Ginevicius, R. (2017). Role of stakeholders leading to development of higher education services. Journal of Engineering Management in Production and Services. Volume 9 • Issue 3.pp:63-75.
Lindsten, H., Auvinen, P., and Juuti, T. (2019).  Internal and External Stakeholders’ Impact on Product Development Curriculum Design. Presented in:  International Conference on Engineering And Product Design Education 12-13 September 2019.
Maleki, Ha. (2009). Basics of secondary education planning. Tehran, SAMT Publications [in Persian]. 
Marynowski, S. (2006). Best practices guide to program evaluation for aquatic educators. Available at:www.pandionsystems.com
Marzooqi, R., Amini, M., Turkzadeh, J. and Mohammadi, M. (2014). Compilation and validation of the framework for measuring the achievements of the implicit university curriculum. Curriculum Research Quarterly. 5(4), 145-161 [in Persian]. 
Matkovic, P., Tumbas, P., Sakal, M., and Pavlicevic, V. (2014). University stakeholder in the analysis phase of curriculum development process model. Proceedings of ICERI2014 Conference .17th-19th November, Seville, Spain.
Meyer, M. H., and Bushney, M. J. (2008). Towards a multi-stakeholder-driven model for excellence in higher education curriculum development. SAJHE 22(6). pp 1229–1240.
Momeni Mehmoui, H. (2011). Pathology of curriculum evaluation in higher education. Education Strategies Quarterly. 4(2), 95-100, [in Persian]. 
Muradov, A. (2001). A model of academic program review for program improvement master’s capstone projects. 109. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cie_capstones/109.
Morris, G. S. (1996).Contemporary Curriculum K-8.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Muratova, E. A., and Tayurskaya, M. S. (2014). Stakeholders’ evaluation of learning outcomes in educational programs improvement. Proceedings of the 10th international CDIO conference, Universitat politècnica de catalunya, barcelona, spain.
Nyabero, C. (2016). Toward a collective approach to course evaluation in curriculum development, A contemporary perspective. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35), 60-64.
O'Kane, C. (2013).Stakeholder involvement for programme development. Teaching fellowships. 35. https://arrow.tudublin.ie.
Ramparsed, R. (2000). A strategy for teacher involvement in curriculum development. South African Journal of Education.
Oliver, S., and Hyun, E. (2011). Comprehensive curriculum reform in higher education: collaborative engagement of faculty and administrators. Journal of Case Studies in Education.vol.2.pp.1-20.
Rahdari, M. (2012). Evaluation of educational quality of information technology engineering bachelor's degree in Isfahan University based on SIP model and the need to start it. Master's thesis on educational planning, Isfahan, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology [in Persian]. 
Ramsden, Pal. (2014). Learning to teach in higher education. Translated by Abdul Rahim Noh Ebrahim. Tehran. Farhangian University Publications [in Persian]. 
Roberts, J., Gentry, D., and Townsend, A. (2012). Student perspectives: evaluating a higher education administration program: Journal of Case Studies in Education.Vol1:1-20.
Shawer, S. F., and Alkahtani S. A. (2012). The Relationship between Program Evaluation Experiences and Stakeholder Career Satisfaction. Journal of Creative Education. 3(8), 1336-1344.
Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26:173-184
Spiel, C., Schober, B., and Reimann, R. (2006) .Evaluation of curricula in higher education: Challenges for evaluators. Evaluation Review, 30: 430-450.
The University of Saskatchewan. (2007). Criteria for evaluation of program proposals at the university of saskatchewan. Based on procedural and policy documents as reported to or approved by Council from 1996 to 2007.
The University of Western Ontario (2009). Western guide to curriculum review. Teaching support centre .Available at:www. uwo. ca/tsc.
Turkzadeh, J., Mazrooqi, R., Salimi, Q. and Keshavarzi, F. (2015). Elaboration of evaluation framework of higher education curricula based on strategic approach. Curriculum Research Quarterly, 6(4), 41-64 [in Persian]. 
Ulewicz, R. (2017). The Role of stakeholders in quality assurance in higher education. Journal of Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 1(11), 93-107.
University of Toronto (2014). Guidelines and procedures for the student evaluation of teaching in courses. Available at: http://www.governingcouncil.utoronto .ca/policies/ Policy Student Evaluation of Teaching in Courses.
Uow College. (2018).Curriculum review guidelines. Uow enterprises delegations of authority Part B- Uowc Ltd academic Delegations. Wvncc Board of Governors.
Usan, S. (2016). Program evaluation in education: Processes, strategies and models. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. İkinci Basım .nd Their IUniversity of Victoria. (2015). Procedures for academic program reviews. Associate vice-president academic planning .Available at: https://sas.uvic.ca/SasPortal.ons
Walsh, J .(2016). A research and evaluation framework to monitor impacts of curriculum reform in Maynooth University. Available at: https://eua.eu/resources.
Journal of higher education curriculum studies
Volume 13, Issue 25
September 2022
Pages 179-214

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics